Grouper Developers Forum

[Keith Hazelton <>]

I've had a request to pare down the recipient list for this thread. I'd 
suggest 
.
 

To self-subscribe, visit:
https://lists.internet2.edu/sympa/subscribe/cifer-prov

 --Keith
___________________________

On 10/07/13, Keith Hazelton  wrote:
> Benn,
> 
> Let me be 100% clear, we're NOT talking about trying to do the CIFER APIs 
> by extending SCIM. CIFER's Shared-API group has a good path forward and one 
> we've got hard-won and solid agreement on.
> 
> This is more to say that in addition to implementing the full CIFER APIs it 
> might be useful for some purposes to ALSO expose a SCIM service endpoint.
> 
> --Keith
> _______________
> 
> On 10/07/13, Benn Oshrin wrote:
> > Speaking inappropriately on behalf of OR :) while there could be some use 
> > for a SCIM library I think the immediate use cases are much more around 
> > what the CIFER SOR-Registry API is trying to accomplish. When we last 
> > looked at that, the conclusion seemed to be that SCIM wasn't necessarily 
> > close enough to be worth extending.
> > 
> > Perhaps a topic for ACAMP.
> > 
> > -Benn-
> > 
> > On 10/4/13 4:30 PM, Keith Hazelton wrote:
> > >Let me try to explain this more clearly.
> > >
> > >If we are writing SCIM services for Grouper and potentially for Open 
> > >Registry and Central Person Registry, it might be nice to have open 
> > >source libraries for SCIM. As far as I know today, the currently 
> > >available SCIM libraries are either not open source (UnboundId) or not 
> > >fully featured (SCIMProxy).
> > >
> > >Would there be interest in exploring the creation of an open source SCIM 
> > >library that could be used by Grouper, Open Registry, Central Person 
> > >Registry and potentially other projects?
> > >
> > > Regards, --Keith
> > >_______________
> > >On 10/04/13, Keith Hazelton wrote:
> > >>On the topic of the planned SCIM provisioning service for Grouper:
> > >>
> > >>As far as I know the SCIM world doesn't have an equivalent to the 
> > >>OpenSAML libraries for SAML. So does that mean Grouper developers will 
> > >>have to come up with their own SCIM code from scratch?
> > >>
> > >>Since there's active discussion about adding SCIM support to the two 
> > >>new open source identity registry products, Open Registry and Central 
> > >>Person Registry, I'm wondering if there's an opportunity here to 
> > >>collaborate on the work and perhaps even consider jointly producing an 
> > >>OpenSCIM library.
> > >>
> > >>--Keith
begin:vcard
n:HAZELTON;KEITH;;;
fn:KEITH D HAZELTON
tel;work:608 262-0771
org:University of Wisconsin-Madison;DoIT
adr:;;1210 W. Dayton St.;Madison;WI;53706;US
email;work;internet:
title:Sr. IT Architect
version:2.1
end:vcard