Grouper Developers Forum

[Tom Zeller <>]

I went down the path of incremental provisioning via point in time,
which very well may be the future path, but not "all" data was
available via PIT, so I changed course.

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Chris Hyzer 
<>
 wrote:
> Since old style attributes are going away eventually, we shouldn't put a 
> lot of effort into short term needs for them.
>
> I don't really understand how not having point in time for old style 
> attributes is fixed by looking up a change log entry by id... I tried to 
> follow the last email, but I don't get it...  is it because the change 
> information is in the change log entry for an attribute change and now you 
> can get a reference to it?  E.g. by id from db, or threadlocal, or static 
> lookup?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> 
>  
> [mailto:]
>  On Behalf Of Tom Zeller
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 8:41 AM
> To: Shilen Patel
> Cc: Grouper Dev
> Subject: Re: [grouper-dev] [ldappcng] incremental provisioning : 
> pointInTime ?
>
>> The old style attributes aren't in point in time.  Do they need to be 
>> there?
>>  For 2.0?
>
> Probably not enough time, I think there is another way to do
> incremental provisioning, which is to find a ChangeLogEntry by its id.
>