Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-dev - Re: [grouper-dev] Action Items: Grouper Call 10-Dec-08

Subject: Grouper Developers Forum

List archive

Re: [grouper-dev] Action Items: Grouper Call 10-Dec-08


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Tom Zeller" <>
  • To: "Chris Hyzer" <>
  • Cc: "Grouper Dev" <>
  • Subject: Re: [grouper-dev] Action Items: Grouper Call 10-Dec-08
  • Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:04:04 -0600
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=GyXKRqVeYhYBg+S9RvehuM/qJL4m/g+Lwd1mrmt6fU88zzmZDQOhs/KhiaIZdcFs9H 8W3iQq2CKOnJWFUuiPNR/Cc5FK/m+vdkOfqWSM6QUs8BaPLjSlWYJJ4P0px/98Bsm/SG gxhutowdF4ib7mFbzPLZovfPrKfDgf2cdq7T8=
I'm thinking perhaps we should avoid another distinct package (as you said or like I heard on the call, we've done a good job rolling gsh, usdu, findbadmemberships into the API to avoid versioning snafus).

How about providing grouperClient.jar and grouper.client.properties in the API in lib/ and conf/ ?

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Chris Hyzer <> wrote:

My vote is core, I think it is very useful and should be easily accessible… and that is my understanding of our discussing during the call.   I have a tar.gz and a binary.tar.gz for it…  if we can have two links.

 

Thanks,

Chris

 

From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Tom Zeller
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 12:59 PM
To: Grouper Dev
Subject: Re: [grouper-dev] Action Items: Grouper Call 10-Dec-08

 

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Emily Eisbruch <> wrote:

*New Action Items*  

 

[AI] (TomZ) will modify the software download page to reflect the new Grouper client.

 

Is the Grouper client considered a 'core' package just like the API, UI, and WS ? If so, we need a grouper-client.tar.gz, right ? 

 

Or should the Grouper client be linked under Contributed Software and left as a source download via cvs ?

 

Guidance please ...



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page