Grouper Developers Forum

[Kathryn Huxtable <>]

On Aug 11, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Michael R. Gettes wrote:

> On Aug 11, 2008, at 17:05, Kathryn Huxtable wrote:
>
> > Michael, I'm not sure that ldappc ever correctly handled multiple  
> > chefs cooking isMemberOf. It always deleted everything that it  
> > didn't provision. We need some sort of prefix scheme for these.
>
> My testing from last year showed ldappc was doing the right stuff.
> But, since you are now head chef for ldappc, I will follow your lead.
> If it's broken - then I think it should be fixed.

I think it was always broken. It was certainly intended to work the  
way it does now. You and I are in agreement that we think that should  
be changed.

> > Tom, I disagree with you about using different attributes for  
> > different ldappc instances. This cuts to one of CoManage's heart  
> > chambers. (CoManage has a two-chambered heart.) The isMemberOf  
> > attribute is well understood to contain group membership.
>
> +1

Now we just have to convince Tom. ;-)

-K