Grouper Developers Forum

[Kathryn Huxtable <>]

And of course, similar changes could be made to the permissions queries in
the Signet section.

-K


On 2/17/07 1:56 PM, "Tom Barton" 
<>
 wrote:

> I agree that your proposal is more concise syntax. In fact, maybe even
> leave the <query-list> element out of it.
> 
> Does anyone have any reasons why this syntax should not be trimmed up in
> the next release of ldappc?
> 
> Tom
> 
> Kathryn Huxtable wrote:
>> Oh my, that formatted badly. Try this. -K
>> 
>> 
>> On 2/17/07 10:58 AM, "Kathryn Huxtable" 
>> <>
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>     BTW, I don't really like the selection XML syntax. Instead of having
>>     a separate section with a list with options for each type of
>>     selection, why not mix them, e.g. Instead of
>> 
>>         <group-queries>
>>           <subordinate-stem-queries>
>>             <stem-list>
>>               <stem>testStem</stem>
>>               <stem>qsuob</stem>
>>             </stem-list>
>>           </subordinate-stem-queries>
>>           <attribute-matching-queries>
>>             <attribute-list>
>>               <attribute name="attribute" value="value" />
>>             </attribute-list>
>>           </attribute-matching-queries>
>>         </group-queries>
>>     Why not have:
>> 
>>         <group-queries>
>>           <query-list>
>>               <subordinate-stem stem=²testStem² />
>>               <attribute-match name="attribute" value="value" />
>>           </query-list>
>>         </group-queries>
>>     I think this would be more concise and also more readable. I would
>>     also suggest doing away with the <query-list> element and making the
>>     <group-queries> element take one or more of the different query type
>>     elements.
>> 
>>     BTW, using Blair¹s GroupTypeFilter I have produced a group type
>>     query selector for ldappc. This is done.
>> 
>>     -K
>> 
>>     On 2/12/07 8:12 AM, "blair christensen." 
>> <>
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>>  On 2/10/07, Tom Barton 
>>> <>
>>>  wrote:
>>>> Good suggestion. Ldappc uses GrouperQuery to select groups &
>>>> memberships, and reviewing that just now, I see that there's no group
>>>> type filter. If we create a group type filter, would you be game to
>>>> extend Ldappc's current use of GrouperQuery to include this new
>>     filter?
>>> 
>>>  I added a group type query filter to HEAD in early January so there
>>>  will be API support for this in the next Grouper release.
>> 
>>