Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

grouper-dev - Re: [grouper-dev] Ldappc suggestion

Subject: Grouper Developers Forum

List archive

Re: [grouper-dev] Ldappc suggestion

Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Barton <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [grouper-dev] Ldappc suggestion
  • Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:56:04 -0600

I agree that your proposal is more concise syntax. In fact, maybe even leave the <query-list> element out of it.

Does anyone have any reasons why this syntax should not be trimmed up in the next release of ldappc?


Kathryn Huxtable wrote:
Oh my, that formatted badly. Try this. -K

On 2/17/07 10:58 AM, "Kathryn Huxtable"

BTW, I don't really like the selection XML syntax. Instead of having
a separate section with a list with options for each type of
selection, why not mix them, e.g. Instead of

<attribute name="attribute" value="value" />
Why not have:

<subordinate-stem stem=”testStem” />
<attribute-match name="attribute" value="value" />
I think this would be more concise and also more readable. I would
also suggest doing away with the <query-list> element and making the
<group-queries> element take one or more of the different query type

BTW, using Blair’s GroupTypeFilter I have produced a group type
query selector for ldappc. This is done.


On 2/12/07 8:12 AM, "blair christensen."

> On 2/10/07, Tom Barton
> > Good suggestion. Ldappc uses GrouperQuery to select groups &
> > memberships, and reviewing that just now, I see that there's no group
> > type filter. If we create a group type filter, would you be game to
> > extend Ldappc's current use of GrouperQuery to include this new
> I added a group type query filter to HEAD in early January so there
> will be API support for this in the next Grouper release.

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page