Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

dynes-deployments - Re: [dynes-deployments] PVST+ and DYNES

Subject: DYNES-Deployments

List archive

Re: [dynes-deployments] PVST+ and DYNES


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Dale W. Carder" <>
  • To: "Byron L. Hicks" <>
  • Cc: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [dynes-deployments] PVST+ and DYNES
  • Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 16:51:23 -0500
  • Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport02.merit.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none

Thus spake Byron L. Hicks
()
on Fri, May 17, 2013 at 03:29:51PM -0500:
>
> In a mixed architecture such as DYNES, ION, or the new AL2S, we should
> stick to standards based protocols. Proprietary protocols such as PVST+
> can be dangerous and disruptive.

This has absolutely nothing to do with one protocol being proprietary
or not.

When any two interdomain sites are peering you need to pay attention
to the fine details. This is true whether for BGP or in this case
Spanning Tree. Both give you the tools to inflict damage.

For example, you probably don't want to accept arbitrary BPDU's any more
than you would accept arbitrary NLRI's.

Dale




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page