dynes-deployments - Re: [dynes-deployments] PVST+ and DYNES
Subject: DYNES-Deployments
List archive
- From: Jay Ford <>
- To: "Byron L. Hicks" <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [dynes-deployments] PVST+ and DYNES
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 15:39:59 -0500 (CDT)
- Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport07.merit.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
On Fri, 17 May 2013, Byron L. Hicks wrote:
In a mixed architecture such as DYNES, ION, or the new AL2S, we should
stick to standards based protocols. Proprietary protocols such as PVST+
can be dangerous and disruptive.
I'll make a more general observation that in an internetwork consisting of
multiple domains of control, layer-2 short-cuts can be dangerous and
disruptive.
Why do we build junk like this which undermines all the existing inter-domain
solutions & re-creates problems which then need to be solved again?
Argh.
________________________________________________________________________
Jay Ford, Network Engineering Group, Information Technology Services
University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
email:
,
phone: 319-335-5555, fax: 319-335-2951
- [dynes-deployments] PVST+ and DYNES, Byron L. Hicks, 05/17/2013
- Re: [dynes-deployments] PVST+ and DYNES, Jay Ford, 05/17/2013
- Re: [dynes-deployments] PVST+ and DYNES, Doug Nelson, 05/17/2013
- Re: [dynes-deployments] PVST+ and DYNES, Dale W. Carder, 05/17/2013
- Re: [dynes-deployments] PVST+ and DYNES, Byron L. Hicks, 05/17/2013
- Re: [dynes-deployments] PVST+ and DYNES, Garrison,Nic, 05/17/2013
- Re: [dynes-deployments] PVST+ and DYNES, Byron L. Hicks, 05/17/2013
- Re: [dynes-deployments] PVST+ and DYNES, Jay Ford, 05/17/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.