DKIM Deployment

[Jesse Thompson <>]

On 1/14/2010 10:23 AM, Jesse Thompson wrote:
> Oh sorry, my previous remarks referring to the Date header is incorrect.
> You're right, it's the Received headers that are being changed. (as
> background, this Info-IMS topic was originally brought up by someone
> else, who is claiming that SJSMS is modifying the Date header. This
> explains why I misconstrued the headers in my remarks.)

Update on the Date header issue:

"   there [are] two channel keywords: dayofweek and
    nodayofweek. The first one adds the DoW in a Date field, the
    second one removes it if present. Both of them seems to be not
    suitable in a DKIM context.

I'll try to get clarification on this issue in terms of SJSMS, and 
within the context of the appropriateness of these actions (in Ned's mind.)

Does DKIM attempt to canonicalize the Date header?

Jesse

--
  Jesse Thompson
  Division of Information Technology, University of Wisconsin-Madison
  Email/IM:

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature