DKIM Deployment

[Serge Aumont <>]

Hi

On 13/01/10 23:40, Jim Fenton wrote:
>
> List expansion -- There is a school of thought that messages that pass
> through mailing lists aren't really forwarded at all, they're sent
> anew by the list manager.  Reasonable people disagree on this, but for
> those that argue that the messages are sent anew, it's appropriate
> that the signature come from the list manager.  Personally, when I
> subscribe to a mailing list, I want all the messages on the list, and
> if there's spam on the list, I expect the list owner to police that or
> I will probably unsubscribe.  So I'm really more interested in
> whitelisting the mailing list than the participants, and therefore am
> more interested in a DKIM signature from the mailing list than whether
> or not the participants' signatures survive.

I agree with this strategy but unfortunately it makes ADSP usefulness
for almost every domain. If a domain is using an ADSP record value 
"discardable" .

Suppose "cru.fr" ADSP record is discardable and "internet2.edu" resign
messages before to redistribute them to ddx subscribers. Messages from
cru.fr  will be received with a valid signature but not from the right
domain. The message should be droped. "discardable" is the only
interesting ADSP record, where the real meaning of "all" is "don't known
what you should do with that mail" and real meaning of "unkown" is "this
domain don't use ADSP".

So which domain can use ADSP with a real added value ? Domain without
real users ? 

Serge