ddx - Re: [ddx] DKIM and forwarding

Subject: DKIM Deployment

List archive

Re: [ddx] DKIM and forwarding

From: Dave CROCKER <>
To: Jesse Thompson <>
Cc: Serge Aumont <>, Jim Fenton <>,
Subject: Re: [ddx] DKIM and forwarding
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:32:37 -0800
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking

On 1/14/2010 8:26 AM, Jesse Thompson wrote:

MUST the "relaxed" header canonicalization algorithm be applied?

If so, this is a bug with Sophos' DKIM verification implementation.

The verifier needs to use whatever canonicalization algorithm has been declared by the signer.

That's the nature of mutual hash computation, of course.

d/

--

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

Re: [ddx] DKIM and forwarding, (continued)
- Re: [ddx] DKIM and forwarding, Dave CROCKER, 01/13/2010
  - Re: [ddx] DKIM and forwarding, Jesse Thompson, 01/14/2010
    - Re: [ddx] DKIM and forwarding, Dave CROCKER, 01/14/2010
      - Re: [ddx] DKIM and forwarding, Jesse Thompson, 01/14/2010

List archive

Re: [ddx] DKIM and forwarding