comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] Changing COs (CO-767 & CO-416)
Subject: COmanage Developers List
List archive
- From: Benn Oshrin <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] Changing COs (CO-767 & CO-416)
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 18:41:24 -0500
On 2/17/14 7:01 PM, Arlen Johnson wrote:
The opportunity for a user to change COs explicitly, secondarily
exposing the CO menus for that context is a departure from the current
UI. Entering into the context of a CO for management simplifies the UI
and menus conceptually.
Assuming we're all on board with this change (and I gather from our
conversations that we are, but correct me if I'm wrong), the question
arises: where do we allow a user to select the CO on which to work? One
possibility is shown in the screenshot below - allowing the user to
change CO right next to the CO title itself.
On the one hand, I like it next to the CO title (seems intuitive), on the other hand it seems like visual clutter. My only alternative would be to put it in the black menu, but then we have the CO title there twice.
Independent of where the selection is made, a couple of UI points arise
from this:
* If a user exists in a single CO, they should just see that CO's
title, menu items, and no "change" menu.
* If a user exists in multiple COs, we can default them into one (e.g.
the first) or make them select one. If we make them select a CO,
the "change" menu might read "select your collaborative
organization" until they've done so.
Currently, there is no "entry point" into a CO, only the CMP (/registry). I think we need to allow something like /registry/co:2 to be a valid entry point (CO specific dashboard?).
We had the "select your CO" very early on. It was awful and led to a bunch of bad decisions (on our part). Maybe we can do better this time.
If you have concerns with this approach, let me know. Otherwise, I'll
forge ahead.
Note: no changes are being suggested for the existing "my account" menu
which follows the model of "activity" --> "CO_1 ", "CO_2 ", ..."CO_n ".
For an individual user, this seems a reasonable way to quickly manage
their own account information.
Maybe, but it's also an extra hop when there's only one CO. Perhaps we can discuss some more.
Thanks,
-Benn-
- [comanage-dev] Platform menu (CO-416), Arlen Johnson, 02/17/2014
- [comanage-dev] Changing COs (CO-767 & CO-416), Arlen Johnson, 02/17/2014
- Re: [comanage-dev] Changing COs (CO-767 & CO-416), Benn Oshrin, 02/19/2014
- Re: [comanage-dev] Changing COs (CO-767 & CO-416), Arlen Johnson, 02/20/2014
- Re: [comanage-dev] Changing COs (CO-767 & CO-416), Arlen Johnson, 02/21/2014
- Re: [comanage-dev] Changing COs (CO-767 & CO-416), Scott Koranda, 02/22/2014
- Re: [comanage-dev] Changing COs (CO-767 & CO-416), Arlen Johnson, 02/21/2014
- Re: [comanage-dev] Changing COs (CO-767 & CO-416), Arlen Johnson, 02/20/2014
- Re: [comanage-dev] Changing COs (CO-767 & CO-416), Benn Oshrin, 02/19/2014
- Re: [comanage-dev] Platform menu (CO-416), Benn Oshrin, 02/19/2014
- [comanage-dev] Changing COs (CO-767 & CO-416), Arlen Johnson, 02/17/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.