COmanage Developers List

[Scott Koranda <>]

Hi,

> I have a conflict and will miss today's scrum. 

I am going to have to do an email scrum also.

Did: More work on Grouper integration
Do: More work on Grouper integration
Blockers: None

Thanks,

Scott

> Marie, if you'd like
> to talk UI stuff later today, I'm free from around 2pm PT on.
> Comments to your original message in line, below.
> 
> Did: More work on CO-436, cleared out CO-341 as well
> Do: More work on CO-436, demo planning
> Blockers: None
> 
> On 9/24/12 7:02 AM, Marie Huynh wrote:
> >Scrum (so it's out of the way so we can talk about the UI during the
> >call instead):
> >
> >Did: more edits for this ticket(co438), including editing CoPersonRoles
> >View to add tabs and rearrange content to match these views.
> >Will do: finish CoPersonRoles/further edits pending result of call
> >Blockers: none
> >
> >Marie
> >
> >On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Marie Huynh 
> ><
> ><mailto:>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >             Keep the tiger stripes
> >             Keep the vertical white line
> >
> >    
> > https://skitch.com/mariehuynh/eidmr/comanage-registry-edit-organizational-identity
> >
> >    What do you think of this instead?  I think it looks better with the
> >    rounded corners and the buttons separated by the white line but not
> >    completely cut off.
> 
> Yes, that looks good! Is that going to apply to all table-lists? If
> not, can it?
> 
> >             The CO people groups tab requires the pencil icon
> >
> >    I checked an older version of the page and it didn't have it before
> >    I edited the page.  It doesn't really make sense to add it in given
> >    that there's no editing of the membership to be done, just adding
> >    and deleting done en masse on one page, which are already offered
> >    via links there.
> 
> Do you mean the annoying "edit" pencil that makes less and less
> sense as time goes on? We should definitely do something about that,
> though not necessarily for this ticket.
> 
> >     We should probably talk about changes to how
> >     membership is managed at some point, but that's out of the scope of
> >     this ticket.  At the I2 meeting, maybe.
> 
> Agreed. I've added it to the agenda.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Benn-