COmanage Developers List

[Marie Huynh <>]

Yes, they will be separate.

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Benn Oshrin 
<>
 wrote:
> I'll look at the diff tomorrow (hopefully), but just to be clear... you'll
> commit the changes separately for 89 from those for 94, right? (ie: not
> 89+partial94, then remainder94)
>
> On 11/14/11 9:27 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
>>
>> Some of the files modified for co89 also contain edits for 94.
>> Attached is the diff.  It there's no problem with the edits for 89,
>> I'll commit those.
>>
>> Scott, have you had a chance to take a look at the multiple checkboxes for
>> 94?
>>
>> --- Changelist 'co89':
>> M       trunk/app/models/co_person_role.php
>> M       trunk/app/models/co_person.php
>> M       trunk/app/config/schema/schema.xml
>> M       trunk/app/controllers/co_person_roles_controller.php
>> M       trunk/app/controllers/co_people_controller.php
>> M       trunk/app/libs/lang.php
>> M       trunk/app/views/co_person_roles/fields.inc
>> M       trunk/app/views/co_people/fields.inc
>>
>> --- Changelist 'co94':
>> A       trunk/app/models/demographic.php
>> M       trunk/app/controllers/pages_controller.php
>> A       trunk/app/controllers/demographics_controller.php
>> M       trunk/app/libs/enum.php
>> M       trunk/app/views/pages/menu.ctp
>> A       trunk/app/views/demographics/view.ctp
>> A       trunk/app/views/demographics/edit.ctp
>> A       trunk/app/views/demographics/index.ctp
>> A       trunk/app/views/demographics/add.ctp
>> A       trunk/app/views/demographics/fields.inc
>>
>> Marie
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Scott 
>> Koranda<>
>>   wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> Where is the honorific for names displayed?  It's not in the title of
>>>> the page /co_people/edit.  What are the odds that it will make a
>>>> difference if it's not displayed for the dropdown for sponsor if we
>>>> display first, middle, family, and suffix?
>>>
>>> I think we should display it if available (I don't think it is
>>> a required field).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Benn 
>>>> Oshrin<>
>>>>   wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/2/11 10:15 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Assuming the petitions tables aren't temporary, we can go back to
>>>>>> cm_co_petitions to find the original sponsor and to cm_co_person_roles
>>>>>> for continued enrollment.  COUs are specified in both tables so we can
>>>>>> have per-COU sponsors.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think the petitions will be temporary.
>>>>>
>>>>>> A thought: how does this interact with the nested COUs?  If COUs A and
>>>>>> B are children of COU C, what does a sponsorship to A imply about C?
>>>>>> Permissions shouldn't cross to siblings, but what of parents/children?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think it does, but perhaps Scott will suggest otherwise.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Benn-
>>>>>
>>>
>
>