COmanage Developers List

[Benn Oshrin <>]

I'll look at the diff tomorrow (hopefully), but just to be clear... 
you'll commit the changes separately for 89 from those for 94, right? 
(ie: not 89+partial94, then remainder94)

On 11/14/11 9:27 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
> Some of the files modified for co89 also contain edits for 94.
> Attached is the diff.  It there's no problem with the edits for 89,
> I'll commit those.
>
> Scott, have you had a chance to take a look at the multiple checkboxes for 94?
>
> --- Changelist 'co89':
> M       trunk/app/models/co_person_role.php
> M       trunk/app/models/co_person.php
> M       trunk/app/config/schema/schema.xml
> M       trunk/app/controllers/co_person_roles_controller.php
> M       trunk/app/controllers/co_people_controller.php
> M       trunk/app/libs/lang.php
> M       trunk/app/views/co_person_roles/fields.inc
> M       trunk/app/views/co_people/fields.inc
>
> --- Changelist 'co94':
> A       trunk/app/models/demographic.php
> M       trunk/app/controllers/pages_controller.php
> A       trunk/app/controllers/demographics_controller.php
> M       trunk/app/libs/enum.php
> M       trunk/app/views/pages/menu.ctp
> A       trunk/app/views/demographics/view.ctp
> A       trunk/app/views/demographics/edit.ctp
> A       trunk/app/views/demographics/index.ctp
> A       trunk/app/views/demographics/add.ctp
> A       trunk/app/views/demographics/fields.inc
>
> Marie
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Scott 
> Koranda<>
>   wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > Where is the honorific for names displayed?  It's not in the title of
> > > the page /co_people/edit.  What are the odds that it will make a
> > > difference if it's not displayed for the dropdown for sponsor if we
> > > display first, middle, family, and suffix?
> >
> > I think we should display it if available (I don't think it is
> > a required field).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > > On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Benn 
> > > Oshrin<>
> > >   wrote:
> > > > On 11/2/11 10:15 PM, Marie Huynh wrote:
> > > > > Assuming the petitions tables aren't temporary, we can go back to
> > > > > cm_co_petitions to find the original sponsor and to cm_co_person_roles
> > > > > for continued enrollment.  COUs are specified in both tables so we can
> > > > > have per-COU sponsors.
> > > >
> > > > I don't think the petitions will be temporary.
> > > >
> > > > > A thought: how does this interact with the nested COUs?  If COUs A and
> > > > > B are children of COU C, what does a sponsorship to A imply about C?
> > > > > Permissions shouldn't cross to siblings, but what of parents/children?
> > > >
> > > > I don't think it does, but perhaps Scott will suggest otherwise.
> > > >
> > > > -Benn-