Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] Wireframe from meeting with Albert

Subject: COmanage Developers List

List archive

Re: [comanage-dev] Wireframe from meeting with Albert


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Marie Huynh <>
  • To: Scott Koranda <>
  • Cc: comanage-dev <>
  • Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] Wireframe from meeting with Albert
  • Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:12:27 -0700

> I think this is probably LIGO specific so can you put an issue
> into bugs.ligo.org under 'MyLIGO'?
>

https://bugs.ligo.org/redmine/issues/194

>> He
>> assumes nobody will try to join both CIT and Hanford, so we can sort
>> people by such categories.
>
> I bet he is proven wrong within the year.

We could still sort but have them show up in both lists, plus a note
about being in both. Shall I file that as a related issue or subtask?

>>
>> PI/Group managers should be able to manage council delegates but
>> that's broken on the current system and I may be working on that.  I
>> assume this is just another group managing a COU for us?
>>
>
> No, I don't see council delegates as a COU. It is just a
> group. So I think the scenario is using the COmanage UI to
> push through to Grouper.
>
> We do, however, want each COU to have some special knowledge
> that there does exist a council delegates group.
>

Hmm... I'm still not sure how the council delegates fit into the
picture. What is the purpose of this group and what sort of
interaction is it going to have with other groups or COUs that makes
this special knowledge necessary?

Thanks,

Marie

> Cheers,
>
> Scott
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page