Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

comanage-dev - Re: [comanage-dev] Agenda/Bridge COmanage Dev call 23-July-2010

Subject: COmanage Developers List

List archive

Re: [comanage-dev] Agenda/Bridge COmanage Dev call 23-July-2010


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Benn Oshrin <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [comanage-dev] Agenda/Bridge COmanage Dev call 23-July-2010
  • Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:45:35 -0400

On 7/22/10 9:07 AM, Niels van Dijk wrote:
> Also in regard to the above page: I understand that presenting the level
> of domestication is a tricky issue. However I think it would be nice if
> it were possible to have an overview where one can quickly grasp the
> level of maturity in the blink of an eye. Could we give the different
> levels a 'common' name and reverse the order? So poorly the current
> "level5" domesticated app gets one or no points and level 1a gets 5
> points or starts or something? That would make that '*Overall
> certification of Domestication*' is no longer required as having 5
> points automatically is the highest level. For a rough example, see the
> attached screenshot.

By way of background, the I2 wiki page was the result of 90 minutes of free association and is not necessarily coherent :) We definitely need to spend more time thinking about the proper labels/levels/etc. Your comments are a step in the right direction.

> Some other issues that came to mind:
> - What if multiple implementations exist (as we seem to have for
> confluence already)

Probably one entry with sub-entries, score based on the "best" implementation if that's possible.

> - What if multiple version of the same product have different states of
> domestication? In general I think we could solve this by only having the
> most current version of the product on the wiki domestication frontpage,
> and refer to older versions in a page behind the overview page.

Yeah, again one entry with sub-entries.

-Benn-



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page