Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-pic - Re: [wg-pic] Higher Eds using jabber

Subject: Presence and IntComm WG

List archive

Re: [wg-pic] Higher Eds using jabber


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Shumon Huque <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [wg-pic] Higher Eds using jabber
  • Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:50:49 -0400

Jorj, Tim,

You might want to also check xmpp SRV records at the
institution's domain name, which might find more, eg.
vt.edu's IM server can be discovered with:

$ dig _xmpp-client._tcp.vt.edu SRV

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;_xmpp-client._tcp.vt.edu. IN SRV

;; ANSWER SECTION:
_xmpp-client._tcp.vt.edu. 14400 IN SRV 10 0 5222 im.vt.edu.

This presumes of course that the campus jabber realm is
the same as their domain name, which is probably not
universally true.

--Shumon.

On 6/22/10 11:58 AM, Callahan, Tim wrote:
Thanks Jorj, that's great! That's certainly enough to get us going.

After we're done with that list, here's another idea ...
I noticed my old friends at Virginia Tech aren't on the list, so I was
curious about their server naming convention:
http://computing.vt.edu/vtim.htm

Their server is "im.vt.edu", so another search for im.<domain> may be
useful, but results would have to be parsed for non-jabber services (can we run a bulk
service discovery against a list of servers?)

Snippet from their page:
"VT IM is based on the open source Jabber protocol...
Server/Host Name: im.vt.edu
User/User Name:
[PID]@im.vt.edu
...Security: Use TLS encryption. If this is not available, use SSL encryption. If
asked for a port number, enter 5222 or 5223."

This also reminds me of something I was thinking of after the last call: as we follow
up with institutions, we should include "What's your naming convention" in
the questions. We were already considering security questions, but we should also ask
if they have secure client-server connections, and what type.

Another survey question off the cuff - "are you member of a federated
identity group/InCommon/Are you Shibbolized/etc; are you interested in federated
IM (and perhaps why?)
-Tim

-----Original Message-----
From:


[mailto:]
On Behalf Of Jorj Bauer
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 11:03 AM
To:

Subject: [wg-pic] Higher Eds using jabber

I'm piggybacking off of Mark Prior's IPv6 work for a quick list of institutions to scan.
Just looking at DNS (not checking to see service availability state), I found 49
jabber.<domain> registered hostnames and 4 xmpp.<domain> registered
hostnames in .edu (and some country-specific edus, such as edu.au). Overall, that's 15%
of the edus scanned. (One has both an xmpp and jabber hostname.)

Mark's work (http://www.mrp.net/IPv6_Survey.html) goes outside of the Internet2 membership a bit.
I've run against his whole list, and the overall stats are 207 jabber.<domain> and 88
xmpp.<domain> - 24.5% of the domains scanned. (This is a bit skewed, as 79 organizations have
both an xmpp.<domain> and a jabber.<domain>.)

-- Jorj




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page