Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-pic - Re: [wg-pic] My silly little cell phone idea

Subject: Presence and IntComm WG

List archive

Re: [wg-pic] My silly little cell phone idea


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Stephen Kingham <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [wg-pic] My silly little cell phone idea
  • Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:57:39 +1000

Hi

I am mindful that I do not want to turn this into just a telephone service, so please view these comments accordingly.

Perhaps it would not be hard to find a sponsor, at the Australian equivalent to the Members Meeting we provide free phone calls from IP Telephones.

Also we would offer free IP Telephone calls into most of Australia if they came from Internet2's SIP Proxy Server as part of a test/trial, and we would also do the SMS gateway for calls into Australia as part of the test/trial for free as well.
Stephen

Candace Holman wrote:

It sounds lovely, but it would be a good idea to find a sponsor ($ and technical setup and monitoring) for the PSTN gateway before investing any time in the development and planning.

Candace

At 05:39 PM 6/21/2004, you wrote:

This idea does help make the IC part of PIC a reality. And given the
way Joe describes it, it also makes nice use of the P in PIC.

Personally, I like it.

--On Monday, June 21, 2004 5:34 PM -0400 "Rork, Joseph (J.P.)" <> wrote:


< soapbox>
I am a Vonage user. One of the things that I think is cool is the
click-to-call feature. I just highlight a bit of numeric text on my
computer, push F6, and my analog desk phone rings, connecting me to
the phone number that I highlighted. Simple, stupid, cool. Easier
to use then Skype.

Great, what does this have to do with PIC?

I realize that our group promotes SIP as our protocol of choice, and
that we wish to promote presence and integrated communications using
SIP. However, I also thing that we can achieve our goal without
demanding that we are SIP end-to-end. SIP.edu, which actually likes
SIP so much that it has SIP in it's name, isn't always SIP
end-to-end. But people get the idea. I use SIP, I contact someone.
I argue that we relax our grip on controlling all aspects of the
RTC, and focus more on the PIC. All the end user wants to do is
communicate with someone; we want to show them how to use PIC to
communicate with that someone more effectively.

I propose that we allow the conference attendees to add their
existing cell phones to their profile at the conference, mimicking
what a real world implementation might look like today. Then, as
part of our integrated communications package, we offer this as a
voice endpoint using the SIP-to-PSTN gateway we plan on providing.
It will allow he end user to make softphone to cell and cell to cell
calls, depending on how we implement it.

We can take it one step further and allow people to not only
register their cell phone number, but also their SMS contact as
well.

Scenario 1: Tarzan wants to call Jane. Tarzan is using a SIP
softphone on his computer and puts in
.
The system
sees that Jane is registered at softphone

and rings
her softphone. Done already today.

Scenario 2: Same as one, but Jane's battery on her laptop died and
she isn't registered at all. System recognizes this, and redirects
the call to the cell phone that Jane provided in her profile out the
PSTN gateway. Note Tarzan still doesn't know Jane's cell, just her
unique identifier.

Scenario 3: Tarzan still wants to call Jane, but Jane is sitting in
a coconut opening seminar, and doesn't want to be disturbed by phone
calls. The system recognizes that Jane has set Jane has set her
"DND by voice" flag, and offers Tarzan the option to IM her. Tarzan
decides no, but instructs the system to have Jane call him when both
of them are not seen as busy by voice.

Scenario 4: Tarzan in hurry, doesn't have time to boot up old 386,
runs to kiosk, logs in as Tarzan, tells system to call Jane using
Tarzan's cell phone. Tarzan's cell phone rings, Jane answers either
cell phone or softphone, depending on which she is using at the
time.

I know that there are some that are not fans of gateways, but we are
putting in a PSTN gateway because we recognize the need to expand
our calling audience. It would be beneficial if we use that same
gateway to extend the integrated part of our communications. I
believe that it would help people 'get' what we are trying to
explain. And it would also help solve that little nagging voice
problem that we admit to having...

< /soapbox>

Regards,
Joseph Rork
Associate Architect
Next Generation Collaborative Computing, SIE
Ford Motor Company
Phone: 313-594-6672
Email:

"There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand
binary, and those who don't."




-------
Deke Kassabian, Senior Technology Director
Information Systems and Computing, Networking and Telecommunications
University of Pennsylvania <URL:http://www.net.isc.upenn.edu/~deke>


--
Stephen Kingham, MIT, BSc, E&C Cert
Project Manager and Consulting Engineer mailto:
Telephone +61 2 6222 3575 (office)
+61 419 417 471 (mobile)
Voice and Video over IP
for The Australian Academic Research Network (AARNet) and
http://www.aarnet.edu.au




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page