wg-pic - Re: [wg-pic] Re: Today's FCC Ruling
Subject: Presence and IntComm WG
List archive
- From: Steve Blair <>
- To:
- Cc: , Ben Teitelbaum <>, VoIP Working Group <>
- Subject: Re: [wg-pic] Re: Today's FCC Ruling
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:07:39 -0500
Jon:
This is why I ask. Other than the user having access to the
familiar handset I can call all of the same places with my video
unit that I can call with my IP phone.
-Steve
Jon Zeeff wrote:
IMO, video conferencing and voip are in the same boat. It's been said that VOIP is video conferencing with the video turned off :-).
I think that low cost video end points (such as the D-Link i2eye and many others) are getting pretty good.
Many of the discussions about VoIP regulation gloss over the
fact that a conversation can take place between video conferencing
units/software using the same codecs and dialing mechanics often
used from an IP phone. Does the FCC or proponents of regulating
VoIP have an opinion on regulating audio conversations conducted
over IP using "video conferencing" equipment and software? If so
can you share some of those opinions?
--
ISC Network Engineering
The University of Pennsylvania
3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A
Philadelphia, PA 19104
voice: 215-573-8396
215-746-7903
fax: 215-898-9348
sip:
- Today's FCC Ruling, Ben Teitelbaum, 02/12/2004
- RE: Today's FCC Ruling, CHRIS PEABODY, 02/22/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Today's FCC Ruling, Steve Blair, 02/13/2004
- Re: Today's FCC Ruling, Jon Zeeff, 02/13/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Re: Today's FCC Ruling, Steve Blair, 02/13/2004
- Re: Today's FCC Ruling, Jon Zeeff, 02/13/2004
- RE: Today's FCC Ruling, Jeremy George, 02/13/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.