wg-pic - Re: Today's FCC Ruling
Subject: Presence and IntComm WG
List archive
- From: Jon Zeeff <>
- To: Steve Blair <>,
- Cc: Ben Teitelbaum <>, wg-pic <>, VoIP Working Group <>
- Subject: Re: Today's FCC Ruling
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:55:28 -0500
IMO, video conferencing and voip are in the same boat. It's been said that VOIP is video conferencing with the video turned off :-).
I think that low cost video end points (such as the D-Link i2eye and many others) are getting pretty good.
Many of the discussions about VoIP regulation gloss over the
fact that a conversation can take place between video conferencing
units/software using the same codecs and dialing mechanics often
used from an IP phone. Does the FCC or proponents of regulating
VoIP have an opinion on regulating audio conversations conducted
over IP using "video conferencing" equipment and software? If so
can you share some of those opinions?
- Today's FCC Ruling, Ben Teitelbaum, 02/12/2004
- RE: Today's FCC Ruling, CHRIS PEABODY, 02/22/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Today's FCC Ruling, Steve Blair, 02/13/2004
- Re: Today's FCC Ruling, Jon Zeeff, 02/13/2004
- Re: [wg-pic] Re: Today's FCC Ruling, Steve Blair, 02/13/2004
- Re: Today's FCC Ruling, Jon Zeeff, 02/13/2004
- RE: Today's FCC Ruling, Jeremy George, 02/13/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.