Presence and IntComm WG

[Steve Blair <>]

Ben:

   I;m in favor of using the public addresses.

-Steve

Ben Teitelbaum wrote:

> All,
>
> No one has chimed in yet to support or refute my suspicion that we
> want addresses on the public authenticated net, not the speaker/demo
> net.  We want to be close to users' machines, especially for room
> weather pings, and we don't want to have to worry about routing
> policies that make it difficult to "reach one side from the other".
>
> In order to bind "pals.internet2.edu" appropriately, I need to know
> what we are doing (and possibly need new addresses from Alan) by
> Tuesday.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- ben
>
> Ben Teitelbaum 
> <>
>  writes:
>
>  
>
> > It sounds to me like we might *only* want addresses on the public
> > authenticated net.  
> >
> > -- ben
> >    
>
> Alan Whinery 
> <>
>  writes:
>
>  
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > OK,
> >
> > If I haven't mentioned it, know that there are two networks for the
> > TIP2004 conferences.
> >
> > I just sent Ben addresses for the Speaker/Demo net.
> > The other net is the Public Authenticated net, for attendee wireless,
> > terminal room, laptop bar, where all of your participants' user machines
> > will be.
> >
> > You may want some fixed addresses on the public network as well, and
> > some MAC-based static authentications, if you are to reach one side from
> > the other. If so, sending us mac addresses in advance is good. Don't
> > delay shipping or anything, but it would be good.
> >
> > AW
> >