Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-pic - [WG-PIC:393] RE: Real and Non-Real Time Traffic (was Re: FMM demo notes)

Subject: Presence and IntComm WG

List archive

[WG-PIC:393] RE: Real and Non-Real Time Traffic (was Re: FMM demo notes)


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Guy T Almes <>
  • To: Jon Zeeff <>, Erik Dobbelsteijn <>, "'Enyeart, Mike'" <>, , 'VoIP Working Group' <>
  • Cc: Guy T Almes <>
  • Subject: [WG-PIC:393] RE: Real and Non-Real Time Traffic (was Re: FMM demo notes)
  • Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 16:12:36 -0500

Jon,
I've just heard from the NOC and from Juniper. The answer is "about 100 msec". This could, I suppose, be reduced by a change to config. Further, this max amount would only happen when there is serious congestion which, as far as I can tell, has never happened in history.
Regards,
-- Guy

--On Thursday, October 23, 2003 14:11:18 -0400 Jon Zeeff <> wrote:



But my main point here is to note that improvements at the transport
layer are called for (if only to permit the 5 Gb/s flows to happen) and
that those improvements should be driven (in part) by the need to share
the net with jitter intolerant applications such as voip.


I agree completely.

Just curious, what is the maximum queuing delay in an Abilene router (as
they are configured).

Are we considering any queuing algorithms that move small flows ahead of
bulk flows?








----------------------------------------------------------------wg-pic-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at
http://archives.internet2.edu/

----------------------------------------------------------------wg-pic--




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page