wg-pic - [WG-PIC:73] Re: Rough Notes from WG-PIC Demo Planning Call
Subject: Presence and IntComm WG
List archive
- From: Ben Teitelbaum <>
- To:
- Subject: [WG-PIC:73] Re: Rough Notes from WG-PIC Demo Planning Call
- Date: 12 Sep 2003 00:00:54 -0400
> > Jamey Update:
> >
> > [...]
> > * Location data from passive "skiffs"; either custom StrongARM
> > platform or iPAQ in socks
>
> This is really interesting. Jamey, would you (or Jeremy or Ben)
> be willing to say just a little more about this? Do the skiffs
> operate passively in the same spectrum as 802.11 devices and then
> some central device correlates the signal strength data that
> they all see?
Yes. That's my understanding.
> > * How do clients learn location-calendaring service location? SRV?
> > No, let's not require cooperation of YASA from Indiana; will
> > hard-code via config
>
> What do we mean here? Hard code in what config? sipc and wave3?
>
Right. The demo clients will be hard-coded to know about the server
that will serve the calendar augmented location presence.
-- ben
----------------------------------------------------------------wg-pic-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at
http://archives.internet2.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------wg-pic--
- [WG-PIC:69] Rough Notes from WG-PIC Demo Planning Call, Ben Teitelbaum, 09/11/2003
- [WG-PIC:70] Re: Rough Notes from WG-PIC Demo Planning Call, Deke Kassabian, 09/11/2003
- [WG-PIC:72] Re: Rough Notes from WG-PIC Demo Planning Call, Xiaotao Wu, 09/11/2003
- [WG-PIC:73] Re: Rough Notes from WG-PIC Demo Planning Call, Ben Teitelbaum, 09/12/2003
- [WG-PIC:74] Re: Rough Notes from WG-PIC Demo Planning Call, Jamey Hicks, 09/12/2003
- [WG-PIC:70] Re: Rough Notes from WG-PIC Demo Planning Call, Deke Kassabian, 09/11/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.