Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-multicast - Re: MLD snooping

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: MLD snooping


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Curtis, Bruce" <>
  • To: wg-multicast <>
  • Subject: Re: MLD snooping
  • Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:50:25 -0700
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US


On Jan 11, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Curtis, Bruce wrote:

>
> On Nov 10, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
>
>> Who want's to open a TAC case? :-)
>
>
>
> Cisco finally opened a bug, here is the ID.
>
>
> CSCtl51859 IPv6 MLD Snooping Causes Neighbor Discovery to Fail

Cisco says they have fixed this bug. The bug report says it is fixed in
15.0(4.1)SID but I see that while 12.2(58)SE is listed as an affected version
12.2(58)SE1 is not listed as an affected version.

We probably won't verify this is fixed until next week.

>
>
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Curtis, Bruce
>> <>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:22 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
>>>
>>>> We noticed that a recent upgrade on our Catalyst 3560 and 3750s made
>>>> it so that MLD broke ND (and thus IPv6). I haven't had time to check
>>>> into it more, but we assumed it was a bug and disabled MLD snooping
>>>> for now. MLD snooping seemed to work OK in previous releases.
>>>>
>>>> I did some searching a few weeks ago and couldn't find anyone else
>>>> talking about the problem. This is the first time I've seen someone
>>>> else mention the issue.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone else seen MLD snooping break ND or is it just a
>>>> configuration oversight?
>>>
>>> I checked and MLD Snooping wasn't braking ND on our 3750s.
>>>
>>> We then upgraded to the latest code on a single 3750 and MLD snooping did
>>> indeed break ND.
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Multicast maillist
>>>> <>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> As per RFC 4541 (Considerations for Internet Group Management Protocol
>>>>> (IGMP)and Multicast Listener Discovery (MLD) Snooping Switches), it is
>>>>> inferred that forwarding criteria for all multicast IPv6 address (except
>>>>> ff02::1) is always based on group database as MLD is mandated for all
>>>>> the
>>>>> multicast v6 address.
>>>>>
>>>>> As per this, there is no special consideration for solicited multicast
>>>>> addresses or multicast addresses used for protocol control traffic.
>>>>>
>>>>> I feel this could cause issues in protocol adjacency maintenance or DAD
>>>>> process.
>>>>>
>>>>> Below is the link discussing about CISCO mld snooping breaking DAD
>>>>> functionality.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://networking.itags.org/networking-tech/148011/
>>>>>
>>>>> OSPFv3 adjacency could break if MLD snooping is enabled on a L2 switch
>>>>> between two OSPFv3 neighbors. (If the enable configuration happens just
>>>>> after a MLD query in the network, It would take another 120+ seconds to
>>>>> get
>>>>> the MLD report for FF02::5. OSPFv3 hello packets will not be forwarded
>>>>> by
>>>>> the MLD snooping enabled switch till report for FF02::5 is received and
>>>>> adjacency will break).
>>>>>
>>>>> There was a draft draft-pashby-magma-simplify-mld-snooping-01.txt
>>>>> stating
>>>>> that multicast traffic for solicited addresses and control packet
>>>>> reserved
>>>>> addresses should be forwarded to all ports. But that draft was not taken
>>>>> forward and has expired.
>>>>>
>>>>> What is the stand taken by vendors implementing MLD snooping to address
>>>>> the
>>>>> above issues?
>>>>>
>>>>> Shouldn’t the MLD snooping enabled switch forward the traffic for
>>>>> solicited
>>>>> multicast address and protocol control packets to all the ports of VLAN?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Magna.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ray Soucy
>>>>
>>>> Epic Communications Specialist
>>>>
>>>> Phone: +1 (207) 561-3526
>>>>
>>>> Networkmaine, a Unit of the University of Maine System
>>>> http://www.networkmaine.net/
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Bruce Curtis
>>>
>>> Certified NetAnalyst II 701-231-8527
>>> North Dakota State University
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ray Soucy
>>
>> Epic Communications Specialist
>>
>> Phone: +1 (207) 561-3526
>>
>> Networkmaine, a Unit of the University of Maine System
>> http://www.networkmaine.net/
>>
>
> ---
> Bruce Curtis
>
> Certified NetAnalyst II 701-231-8527
> North Dakota State University
>
>
>
>
>

---
Bruce Curtis

Certified NetAnalyst II 701-231-8527
North Dakota State University




  • Re: MLD snooping, Curtis, Bruce, 07/12/2011

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page