Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-multicast - Re: RPF Oddity

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: RPF Oddity


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Michael Lambert <>
  • To: wg-multicast <>
  • Subject: Re: RPF Oddity
  • Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:19:53 -0500

Caren (and anyone else listening),

On 10 Nov 2009, at 13:55:57, Caren Litvanyi wrote:

hsc-1#sh ip rpf 141.142.2.55
RPF information for jhereg.ncsa.uiuc.edu (141.142.2.55)
RPF interface: GigabitEthernet1/1
RPF neighbor: hsc-inet-vl998.nsog.wvu.edu (10.0.6.114)
RPF route/mask: 157.182.0.0/16
RPF type: unicast ()
RPF recursion count: 0
Doing distance-preferred lookups across tables

Nope. That route/mask makes no sense for 141.142.2.55.
I'm not that great at Ciscoese these days, but I would have
also thought it would tell you where it got the information
from under RPF type: unicast (), even if it were static or connected,
let alone a routing protocol.
I'd probably raise the white flag and open a case. Do you
know how it was supposed to be learning the right RPF path?
MBGP? Or?

Well... A 'show ip route' yields these nuggets (uninteresting cruft removed):

Gateway of last resort is 10.0.6.114 to network 157.182.0.0

D* 157.182.0.0/16 [90/2816] via 10.0.6.114, 1d00h, GigabitEthernet1/1
D*EX 0.0.0.0/0 [170/3072] via 10.0.6.114, 1d00h, GigabitEthernet1/1

The '*' indicates a candidate default. Huh? Maybe this is just some weird EIGRPism, since the config says nothing about generating a default.

I'm thinking a static default mroute to the upstream interface will be a sufficient workaround.

Michael



  • RPF Oddity, Michael Lambert, 11/10/2009
    • Re: RPF Oddity, Caren Litvanyi, 11/10/2009
      • Re: RPF Oddity, Michael Lambert, 11/10/2009

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page