wg-multicast - Re: RPF Oddity
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Michael Lambert <>
- To: wg-multicast <>
- Subject: Re: RPF Oddity
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:19:53 -0500
Caren (and anyone else listening),
On 10 Nov 2009, at 13:55:57, Caren Litvanyi wrote:
hsc-1#sh ip rpf 141.142.2.55
RPF information for jhereg.ncsa.uiuc.edu (141.142.2.55)
RPF interface: GigabitEthernet1/1
RPF neighbor: hsc-inet-vl998.nsog.wvu.edu (10.0.6.114)
RPF route/mask: 157.182.0.0/16
RPF type: unicast ()
RPF recursion count: 0
Doing distance-preferred lookups across tables
Nope. That route/mask makes no sense for 141.142.2.55.
I'm not that great at Ciscoese these days, but I would have
also thought it would tell you where it got the information
from under RPF type: unicast (), even if it were static or connected,
let alone a routing protocol.
I'd probably raise the white flag and open a case. Do you
know how it was supposed to be learning the right RPF path?
MBGP? Or?
Well... A 'show ip route' yields these nuggets (uninteresting cruft removed):
Gateway of last resort is 10.0.6.114 to network 157.182.0.0
D* 157.182.0.0/16 [90/2816] via 10.0.6.114, 1d00h, GigabitEthernet1/1
D*EX 0.0.0.0/0 [170/3072] via 10.0.6.114, 1d00h, GigabitEthernet1/1
The '*' indicates a candidate default. Huh? Maybe this is just some weird EIGRPism, since the config says nothing about generating a default.
I'm thinking a static default mroute to the upstream interface will be a sufficient workaround.
Michael
- RPF Oddity, Michael Lambert, 11/10/2009
- Re: RPF Oddity, Caren Litvanyi, 11/10/2009
- Re: RPF Oddity, Michael Lambert, 11/10/2009
- Re: RPF Oddity, Caren Litvanyi, 11/10/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.