wg-multicast - Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Jimmy Kyriannis <>
- To: ken lindahl <>
- Cc: Toerless Eckert <>, Michael Forrest <>, , Chi-Che Hou <>, Andrew Kessler <>
- Subject: Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue
- Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 12:58:40 -0400
At 02:02 AM 5/2/2006, ken lindahl wrote:
hi Toerless et al,
Toerless Eckert wrote:
c) In general we recommend not to enable SAP, so i am very interested
to get a reinforcement about how useful this command still is
to common user practices ;-))
i will shamelessly confess that SAP listening is enabled in all
of our routers, and on more than one occasion i have successfully
used "show ip sap" to quickly narrow down the location of a problem.
("ok, 134 sessions shown on this router, 132 on this one, but only 67
on this one, wtf???")
We too run SAP listeners on routers, but have been forced to cut down on its use because we've been burned by it in a few instances. In a couple of events over the past year or so, individuals sourced 4+ GB of data to the SAP group, and as the Cisco routers (running fairly recent 12.2(18)SX code) gobbled up the data, their CPU loads when through the roof. The routers lost their OSPF adjacencies, and the mess continued from there...
I posted some data on this to the MBONE development group last year, suggesting at least some rudimentary protection into the SAP listener IOS code, such as putting a cap on how much data a router would ingest on a per announcement basis. The feedback I received, however, wasn't encouraging, and the general view was that it was not considered wise to run SAP listeners on routers exposed to the wild.
We've also found that routers running SAP listeners are great at giving us rudimentary multicast diagnostic windows into distant portions of our networks, especially given the lack of strong multicast diagnostic tools. This simple diagnostic feature spares folks considerable time and effort through a simple "show command", where either running out to some distant building for a brief test or installing SAP probes around our network wouldn't be practical nor scalable. Having at least the ability to run a SAP listener without concern for processor spikes or invalid format complaints continues to be quite valuable.
Jimmy
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, Toerless Eckert, 05/01/2006
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, Brent Draney, 05/02/2006
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, ken lindahl, 05/02/2006
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, John Kristoff, 05/02/2006
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, Marshall Eubanks, 05/02/2006
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, Tim Chown, 05/02/2006
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, Bill Owens, 05/02/2006
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, Tim Chown, 05/02/2006
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, David Farmer, 05/02/2006
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, Marshall Eubanks, 05/02/2006
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, Stig Venaas, 05/02/2006
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, christian . macnevin, 05/03/2006
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, Jimmy Kyriannis, 05/02/2006
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, John Kristoff, 05/02/2006
- Re: Cisco IPv4 Multicast Issue, Bill Owens, 05/02/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.