wg-multicast - Re: Measured rate of MBGP adoption ?
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Toerless Eckert <>
- To: Marshall Eubanks <>
- Cc: Toerless Eckert <>, ,
- Subject: Re: Measured rate of MBGP adoption ?
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 20:25:15 -0700
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:03:58PM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> How would you measure this ? By comparing MSDP SA source addresses with
> the MBGP tables ?
Yes, exactly. Beside the number (n% of SA available in MBGP), it
would also be nice to have an idea of the top BGP route prefixes that cover
the most non-MBGP SAs - eg: those domains that do not have MBGP and
actually are active sources.
> And what is the significance of this ?
It's related to the issue of how to do multicast RPF lookup mechanism,
distance vs. longest mask lookups and SAFI 1 vs. SAFI 3 route announcements.
Basically with BGP being used for IP multicast RPF lookup and incongruent
BGP/MBGP prefix lengths you need to interpret BGP prefixes as conditional
SAFI 3 and arbitrate purely by distance. This is extremely confusing to
users because it deviates extremely from the purely longest-mask IP unicast
routing lookup. In addition, SAFI 3 is being deprecated in IPv6 and as such
this strategy becomes even more ugly in there - and reversing the argument,
if there is a clean and easy solution for IPv6 then we should of course also
try to move towards it in IPv4.
So, basically i would like to see that we are getting to a point where there
really are no active multicast sources in the transitive core of the Internet
that are relying purely on BGP instead of actively being announced into MBGP -
at least by the edge ISP.
Cheers
Toerless
- Measured rate of MBGP adoption ?, Toerless Eckert, 05/12/2003
- Re: Measured rate of MBGP adoption ?, Marshall Eubanks, 05/12/2003
- Re: Measured rate of MBGP adoption ?, Toerless Eckert, 05/12/2003
- Re: Measured rate of MBGP adoption ?, Marshall Eubanks, 05/12/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.