Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-multicast - Re: MSDP and the standards process [was Re: (MSDP problems.....)]

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: MSDP and the standards process [was Re: (MSDP problems.....)]


Chronological Thread 
  • From: David Meyer <>
  • To: John Zwiebel <>
  • Cc: "Lucy E. Lynch" <>, Marshall Eubanks <>, Bill Owens <>, ,
  • Subject: Re: MSDP and the standards process [was Re: (MSDP problems.....)]
  • Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 14:15:27 -0700

>> > If ASM is going away, should we give up on MSDP (from the
>> > standards perspective)? I'm struggling with this problem right
>> > now. If we give up, what should we do with (i). what's deployed,
>> > and (ii). the current spec?
>>
>> IMHO, if you put your "oomph" behind SSM, you can probably
>> stop worrying about ever finishing MSDP. But that means you
>> have to really push it Dave. I mean be vocal and demanding
>> and generally an a-- like I feel I'm doing now.
>>
>> I did say to Lucy that there would be a place for MSDP but it
>> was assuming that ASM isn't going to go away completely
>> (and it might not, but I don't have the imagination to see why it
>> shouldn't)
>>
>> And the many-to-many problem still exists that has to be
>> solved in the interdomain environment. ie how do you deploy
>> bi-dir pim across the internet?

Uh, Z, have you checked out how much "oomph" I have these days? I
don't think you'd be too impressed :-)

But seriously, I would like to find the solution to the MSDP
quandry, in the IETF at least.

Dave




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page