Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-multicast - RE: link-layer IP multicast vs. L2 switches

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

RE: link-layer IP multicast vs. L2 switches


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Richard Mavrogeanes" <>
  • To: "Alan Crosswell" <>, <>
  • Cc: "West Schoenfuss" <>
  • Subject: RE: link-layer IP multicast vs. L2 switches
  • Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 13:20:37 -0400

We've got several hundred mbps of multicast running 7x24 on our catalyst. I
believe you simply need to engage snooping, plus the catalyst has a very bad
artifact: there must be at least one receiver to each multicast or it floods.
We get around this by having our sources join their own multicast.

hope this helps

Rich


-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Crosswell
[mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:53 PM
To:

Subject: link-layer IP multicast vs. L2 switches


Does anybody know if there's a way to get link-layer IP multicast to do
the "right thing"? I discovered that my link-layer multicasts were being
flooded by my Catalyst 4000 switch. I think maybe this is just the way it
is since I would guess that by definition link-layer multicast doesn't ever
speak to the IGMP router.

I guess I will implement my subnet multicast with admin-scoped groups and
filters on my routers instead....

Comments, corrections, commissertaion? :-)

/a




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page