All things related to multicast

[Amel Caldwell <>]

I was not specific, this is for SA filtering only.

On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Tom Pusateri wrote:

>I hope there is an error here.
>
>Nobody should be filtering SSM (232/8) at their borders.
>
>Tom
>
>In message 
><.
>edu> you write:
>>Funny you should ask.  I just ran accross it in:
>>
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mboned-ipv4-mcast-bcp-00.txt
>>
>>Part of this near the bottom lists some groups to filter and this is 
>>included
>>and said to be Altiris.
>>
>>  224.0.1.2/32:      SGI Dogfight game and related services
>>   224.0.1.3/32:      RWHOD
>>   224.0.1.8/32:      Suns NIS+
>>   224.0.1.22/32:     SVRLOC
>>   224.0.1.24/32:     MICROSOFT-DS
>>   224.0.1.25/32
>>   224.0.1.35/32:     SVRLOC-DA
>>   224.0.1.39/32:     Ciscos Rendezvous Point Announcement Protocol
>>   224.0.1.40/32:     Ciscos Rendezvous Point Discovery Protocol
>>   224.0.1.60/32:     HPs Device Discovery Protocol
>>   224.0.2.1/32:      rwho group (BSD)
>>   224.0.2.2/32:      Suns Remote Procedure Call Protocol
>>   225.1.2.3/32:      Altiris
>>   229.55.150.208/32: Norton Ghost disk duplication software
>>   232.0.0.0/8:       Source-Specific Multicast
>>   234.42.42.42/30:   ImageCast
>>   239.0.0.0/8:       Administratively Scoped IPv4 Group Addresses
>>
>>I've been filtering 225.1.2.3 for a while with no ill-effects.
>>
>>Amel
>>
>>On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Alan Crosswell wrote:
>>
>>>>Do you know what group 225.1.2.3 is for?  I was snooping around some WWW 
>>>>sit
>>es
>>>I think it's just people picking a number at random.  Avoid 224.* 'cuz many
>>>of those are well known, so start with 225 and then do 1.2.3.
>>>/a
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>