wg-multicast - Re: I2 and T1

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: I2 and T1

From: Rick Summerhill <>
To: Hans Kuhn <>
Cc: Marshall Eubanks <>, Internet 2 mail list <>, MbonedD List <>
Subject: Re: I2 and T1
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 11:20:07 -0500 (CDT)

On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Hans Kuhn wrote:

> Marshall,
>
> When we do NANOG and IETF, we use 1000 Kbit/s for that very
> reason.
>
> The folks at I2, probably didn't think about this issue
> since OC-3 is generally the smallest pipe that I2
> institutions have (modulo Hawaii and maybe one or two
> others that got exemptions).

Yes, I think that is the assumption. I have a FR half T1 to my home office,
connected to our gigapop and multicast enabled, but the stream is just
large enough to be disruptive. Had to resort to real at 256. Sigh! -:)
BTW, the h.261 internal channel 2 from UO isn't bad for me. -:)

--Rick

--
Rick Summerhill Executive Director, GPN
5008 Canyon Road

Manhattan, KS 66503 Cell: 785-341-7878
Voice: 785-587-4642 Fax: 785-587-4642

I2 and T1, Marshall Eubanks, 10/02/2001
- Re: I2 and T1, Lucy E. Lynch, 10/02/2001
  - Re: I2 and T1, Lucy E. Lynch, 10/02/2001
- Re: I2 and T1, Hans Kuhn, 10/02/2001
  - Re: I2 and T1, Rick Summerhill, 10/02/2001
  - Re: I2 and T1, Marshall Eubanks, 10/02/2001
- Re: I2 and T1, Hank Magnuski, 10/02/2001
  - Re: I2 and T1, Marshall Eubanks, 10/02/2001
    - Re: I2 and T1, Lucy E. Lynch, 10/02/2001
      - I2 multicasts, Marshall Eubanks, 10/03/2001
        
        Re: I2 multicasts, Lucy E. Lynch, 10/03/2001
        
        Re: I2 multicasts, Marshall Eubanks, 10/03/2001

List archive

Re: I2 and T1