All things related to multicast

[Bill Nickless <>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

I'm working on an Internet Draft that describes current practice for IPv4 
Multicast routing.  This Internet Draft includes a table of IPv4 multicast 
groups that I've sort of picked up over time that are generally 
black-holed.  Following is the table that I have; do you use the same table 
of known-bad groups?  Are there any other groups that you believe should be 
included in this table?

224.0.1.2/32:      SGI "Dogfight" game
224.0.1.3/32:      RWHOD
224.0.1.22/32:     SVRLOC
224.0.1.24/32:     MICROSOFT-DS
224.0.1.35/32:     SVRLOC-DA
224.0.1.39/32:     Cisco's Rendezvous Point Announcement Protocol
224.0.1.40/32:     Cisco's Rendezvous Point Discovery Protocol
224.0.1.60/32:     HP's Device Discovery Protocol
224.0.2.2/32:      Sun's Remote Procedure Call Protocol
229.55.150.208/32: Norton "Ghost" disk duplication software


Please send me direct email and I'll summarize the results back to these 
lists (wg-multicast, nanog, and mboned).

Thank you,

===
Bill Nickless    http://www.mcs.anl.gov/people/nickless      +1 630 252 7390
PGP:0E 0F 16 80 C5 B1 69 52 E1 44 1A A5 0E 1B 74 F7     


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQCVAwUBOs0RVKwgm7ipJDXBAQHUUQP9EJOcCFZIsZTv4UH+S3/Hf9pYiWd7XSf9
QXFTwfUL7y31Xke0gp+PNq/Cyc0Xo+vkw6zmLgHQpGrkOW9MMXDSe1O2jsuJut/8
a2RYlnysl7U13QZSu3CZoElJAaAjtLEDAR3auj5cM0jsY3CRgtQ7POhzNMv/nw9R
qpXBaCWFlaM=
=LyCp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----