Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-irr - [WG-IRR] Possibly new Google docs on IRR use?

Subject: Registry Working Group

List archive

[WG-IRR] Possibly new Google docs on IRR use?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Bill Owens <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: [WG-IRR] Possibly new Google docs on IRR use?
  • Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 21:54:43 +0000
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1;spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nysernet.org;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nysernet.org;dkim=pass header.d=nysernet.org;arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=viPU7F66I71mMEw7CeE6Bwq/GcBVIqAoTrYeLOorqaw=; b=Jngqvg+59Biq6EgoceRI6GwxYIkF08fgkX+bcVA8af3MBEA7MBacKvu0yZZXjht576tqEKSbya7ZNnPJfqqxTNuN9K9Xcc9dK51ULVxVC8mFLrHa64y8lLzGpx9PxGw1MjdD0TtduO6mxCo51suyjqL6W06dPiJDSrCRCOk/I4c36/S/5jtWSMTxYx0DhpobVfvrmHTDTdMVhnFGFDGHov5WX4Y6/WxJqlGbXKObUmVf/y8VuM/pn0WAEynrjTXttzDrGRTmgIEUi/CaLYh3Se9fFK+L8OAD10uJWfBBO5VN1g4DV2Z/5w5QEOsSuWSzKS+Xpl8F68iJJJ6CG/Bbpg==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=k1Fcx/Y0LeTAHrOBO744RMERESkyBcbHtcaapEwv5a+Bo8Wl3ovXXABjPsFz9oIioEwokb9nczCXZOJRSn5h66X1FlicOyTtndxP0oHBUhIgbivQZCHfLDD/Q+euOVp22NUzhzw/Z9P/iXEsPyyzUwJfyMsGVc01GDDQgae7IN1bbZokAuvmv3kR/JaAr5n69jR1EfawmUSAZ/zmAYTitf/pCQbqjnQ9krVZ55WoADgkn22T+pBDUbXlAl8McMGyVa3f0pKoKeSlh2bIqkDzNIs+WTp4+xpADsMuqjpgdgian2mV1c0i3yENmfwDglDYRB+qfEw3ROyPk6Lvj2UWvg==

Can someone who is better at poking around websites tell whether this is
relatively new content? I don't remember finding the page before, and I have
definitely searched:

https://support.google.com/interconnect/answer/9368848?hl=en&ref_topic=9326690

There are at least two interesting items therein...

Their list of IRRs that is much larger than they've previously posted:
ALTDB, APNIC, ARIN, BBOI, BELL Canada, CANARIE, EASYNET, HOST, JPIRR, Level4,
NESTEGG, NTT, OPENFACE, OTTIX, PANIX, REACH, RADB, RGNET, RIPE, RISQ, ROGERS,
TC

I've never heard of most of those! Also, Level4?!

And more ominously, they seem to want every network to have both route/route6
and aut-num objects, including import and export elements. We've been
avoiding aut-num, not difficult to create them but describing the policies is
potentially dangerous. I'm wondering if we can just do the wide-open config
and satisfy them:

import: from AS-ANY accept ANY
export: to AS-ANY announce ASnnnn

At one point their examples seem to imply that, though they don’t provide the
exact wording that I would like. I guess time will tell.

Bill.




  • [WG-IRR] Possibly new Google docs on IRR use?, Bill Owens, 08/01/2019

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page