Shibboleth Developers

[Chad La Joie <>]

Okay.  Just wanted to make sure everyone was on the same page.

On 4/7/11 1:14 PM, Cantor, Scott E. wrote:
>> On 4/7/11 12:45 PM, Cantor, Scott E. wrote:
>> What part exactly do you think v3 won't support?
> 
> A GUI enabling per-attribute consent.
>  
>> We will support the IdP releasing all attributes and allowing users to
>> consent to them.  The only thing that isn't on the roadmap is a UI that
>> has per-attribute checkboxes because, as you said before, we don't have
>> a high degree of confidence that we can make this intelligible.
> 
> That's all I'm talking about. But the problem is that if somebody does 
> implement that feature and wants to use it along with isRequired to make 
> sure people release the required stuff, they in turn prevent the SP from 
> asking for alternative attribute names on required attributes.
>  
> So that's the trade-off unless and until we start over.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 

-- 
Chad La Joie
http://itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered