Shibboleth Developers

["Cantor, Scott E." <>]

> On 4/7/11 12:45 PM, Cantor, Scott E. wrote:
> What part exactly do you think v3 won't support?

A GUI enabling per-attribute consent.
 
> We will support the IdP releasing all attributes and allowing users to
> consent to them.  The only thing that isn't on the roadmap is a UI that
> has per-attribute checkboxes because, as you said before, we don't have
> a high degree of confidence that we can make this intelligible.

That's all I'm talking about. But the problem is that if somebody does 
implement that feature and wants to use it along with isRequired to make sure 
people release the required stuff, they in turn prevent the SP from asking 
for alternative attribute names on required attributes.
 
So that's the trade-off unless and until we start over.

-- Scott