Shibboleth Developers

["Scott Cantor" <>]

>  > is it reasonable to try and create a new shared Spring component that
> would have to be defined in the low level IdP files (internal.xml, I
> guess) ?
> 
> Yes.
> 
>  > expose its config options as options on each extension I build
> 
> Less preferable.  Sounds like re-solving the problem Spring is supposed
> to be solving.

That's kind of what I thought, I just don't want to have perform
internal.xml surgery when I do upgrades. Is there a way to supplement the
set of files it loads to define components?

-- Scott