Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Andrew Petro <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions
  • Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:24:00 -0400

> is it reasonable to try and create a new shared Spring component that would have to be defined in the low level IdP files (internal.xml, I guess) ?

Yes.

> expose its config options as options on each extension I build

Less preferable. Sounds like re-solving the problem Spring is supposed to be solving.

Andrew


On 09/24/2010 02:22 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:
Just a question to those more Java/Spring savvy...if I'm building multiple
extensions that share some internal component with a number of configuration
inputs that I'm creating as part of the extensions, is it reasonable to try
and create a new shared Spring component that would have to be defined in
the low level IdP files (internal.xml, I guess) ?

Or is that a maintenance hassle and I should just embed the component
directly in my extensions and expose its config options as options on each
extension I build?

-- Scott






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page