shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Andrew Petro <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:24:00 -0400
> is it reasonable to try and create a new shared Spring component that would have to be defined in the low level IdP files (internal.xml, I guess) ?
Yes.
> expose its config options as options on each extension I build
Less preferable. Sounds like re-solving the problem Spring is supposed to be solving.
Andrew
On 09/24/2010 02:22 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:
Just a question to those more Java/Spring savvy...if I'm building multiple
extensions that share some internal component with a number of configuration
inputs that I'm creating as part of the extensions, is it reasonable to try
and create a new shared Spring component that would have to be defined in
the low level IdP files (internal.xml, I guess) ?
Or is that a maintenance hassle and I should just embed the component
directly in my extensions and expose its config options as options on each
extension I build?
-- Scott
- [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions, Scott Cantor, 09/24/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions, Andrew Petro, 09/24/2010
- RE: [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions, Scott Cantor, 09/24/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions, Paul Hethmon, 09/24/2010
- RE: [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions, Scott Cantor, 09/24/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions, Andrew Petro, 09/24/2010
- RE: [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions, Scott Cantor, 09/24/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions, Paul Hethmon, 09/24/2010
- RE: [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions, Scott Cantor, 09/24/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] "Design" question re: IdP extensions, Andrew Petro, 09/24/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.