Shibboleth Developers

[Jim Fox <>]

Around here it isn't my place to say what's pointless and what's not. 
Sometimes I suspect a lot of legalese is all that's legal, pointless or 
not.

Jim


On Fri, 11 Jun 2010, Scott Cantor wrote:

> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:36:32 -0700
> From: Scott Cantor 
> <>
> To: 
> ""
>  
> <>
> Reply-To: 
> ""
>  
> <>
> Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] [IdPv3] Consent Engine Work
>
> On Jun 11, 2010, at 2:36 AM, Bruc Liong 
> <>
>  wrote:
>
>       From what we've played during MAMS Federation, IMHO putting things in 
> metadata has the added benefit that the IdP and SP can exchange
>       requirements and simplify user's experience dealing with "just a bunch of 
> attributes". SP can asks certain attributes, IdP can present
>       to user the experience whether/not certain service levels can be 
> obtained.
>
>
> I think the privacy policy question is more along side the issue of 
> expressing requirements. I'm just saying that any approach that uses lots of
> legalese is fairly pointless, and something more like what P3P attempted 
> makes more sense.
>
> --Scott