shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] shib-common 1.2.0 and vt-ldap 3.3 release dates ?
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Tom Zeller <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] shib-common 1.2.0 and vt-ldap 3.3 release dates ?
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:29:05 -0500
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Uu3R/TdGr48ChzfVolRbhzn2O5QvXe2Ig8laP4xcX9WI16ewYhSIvKqWq+lDh8l8Wh q9EzlPbxOCwu0RXGoHzCtod8AkBUQcWKF4p9lKqTKZ9NRX72SUhq6xyby++q39BB4uWn zP8HWGxLtLOqd1NQMWVlSX4tCo3U63Jt4CTuI=
Thanks. Is deployment of shib-common-1.2.0-SNAPSHOT a possibility and
a good idea ?
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:
> Sorta. One repository, one version number, but multiple artifacts. My
> hope is that things actually become easier for Tom in 3.x both because
> of API cleanup and because of better code modularization.
>
> On 5/13/10 1:03 PM, Daniel Fisher wrote:
>> The reason I asked is because I was under the impression that
>> shib-common would be moving into the IDP code base for version 3.
>> This may impact the ability of external projects to easily include it as
>> a dependency.
>>
>> --Daniel Fisher
>>
>> On 5/13/10 10:21 AM, Chad La Joie wrote:
>>> To answer for Tom,
>>>
>>> He uses the attribute resolve in one of his projects.
>>>
>>> On 5/13/10 9:38 AM, Daniel Fisher wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've been trying to tag vt-ldap for several weeks now, I just keep
>>>> getting interrupted.
>>>> I'm hopeful this will happen by the end of next week.
>>>>
>>>> Out of curiosity, what sort of dependencies do you have on shib-common?
>>>>
>>>> --Daniel Fisher
>>>>
>>>> On 5/12/10 7:23 PM, Tom Zeller wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm using shib-common and vt-ldap in a provisioning project for
>>>>> grouper, which we were hoping to release at the end of this month. I
>>>>> need vt-ldap 3.3 because those kind folks included additional support
>>>>> for Active Directory which we needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since vt-ldap 3.3 is a requirement, I'll need to depend on shib-common
>>>>> 1.2.0 ... is there a release date scheduled ? or perhaps a stable
>>>>> snapshot ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Tom
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Chad La Joie
> www.itumi.biz
> trusted identities, delivered
>
- shib-common 1.2.0 and vt-ldap 3.3 release dates ?, Tom Zeller, 05/12/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] shib-common 1.2.0 and vt-ldap 3.3 release dates ?, Chad La Joie, 05/12/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] shib-common 1.2.0 and vt-ldap 3.3 release dates ?, Daniel Fisher, 05/13/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] shib-common 1.2.0 and vt-ldap 3.3 release dates ?, Chad La Joie, 05/13/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] shib-common 1.2.0 and vt-ldap 3.3 release dates ?, Daniel Fisher, 05/13/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] shib-common 1.2.0 and vt-ldap 3.3 release dates ?, Chad La Joie, 05/13/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] shib-common 1.2.0 and vt-ldap 3.3 release dates ?, Tom Zeller, 05/19/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] shib-common 1.2.0 and vt-ldap 3.3 release dates ?, Chad La Joie, 05/19/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] shib-common 1.2.0 and vt-ldap 3.3 release dates ?, Tom Zeller, 05/19/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] shib-common 1.2.0 and vt-ldap 3.3 release dates ?, Chad La Joie, 05/13/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] shib-common 1.2.0 and vt-ldap 3.3 release dates ?, Daniel Fisher, 05/13/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] shib-common 1.2.0 and vt-ldap 3.3 release dates ?, Chad La Joie, 05/13/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.