shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] uApprove + IdP 3.x
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Chad La Joie <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] uApprove + IdP 3.x
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:16:40 +0100
- Organization: Itumi, LLC
At this time, the consent engine is a strictly front-channel thing.
On 3/19/10 11:56 AM, Kristof BAJNOK wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can you point to some design docs on how uApprove will integrate into the
> next major IdP release? What concerns me is if it would be used as an
> element in the attribute filter chain, so that it would apply to back-
> channel requests as well.
>
> IMO unsolicited back-channel attribute requests can be used to provide very
> cool things (VO and user provisioning in particular), but it's annoying
> from
> a privacy POV, unless the user could be given some control on the released
> attributes.
>
> I know that _asking_ for user consent is a front-channel thing, but the
> _effects_ of it should influence back-channel as well.
>
> Kristof
--
Chad La Joie
www.itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered
- uApprove + IdP 3.x, Kristof BAJNOK, 03/19/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] uApprove + IdP 3.x, Chad La Joie, 03/19/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] uApprove + IdP 3.x, Kristof BAJNOK, 03/19/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] uApprove + IdP 3.x, Chad La Joie, 03/19/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] uApprove + IdP 3.x, Kristof BAJNOK, 03/19/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] uApprove + IdP 3.x, Peter Schober, 03/19/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] uApprove + IdP 3.x, Kristof BAJNOK, 03/19/2010
- RE: [Shib-Dev] uApprove + IdP 3.x, Scott Cantor, 03/19/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] uApprove + IdP 3.x, Kristof BAJNOK, 03/21/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] uApprove + IdP 3.x, Chad La Joie, 03/19/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] uApprove + IdP 3.x, Kristof BAJNOK, 03/19/2010
- Re: [Shib-Dev] uApprove + IdP 3.x, Chad La Joie, 03/19/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.