shibboleth-dev - RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:35:33 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
Peter Williams wrote on 2009-03-30:
> Who is the"we"? ( as in we dont like...)
The core development team implementing the use case in Shibboleth that I
pointed you to, and to some extent my own responsibility to maintain a safe
SP in the face of emergent change.
Fundamentally this is not a hard issue; either delegation has critical
semantics for a relying party or it doesn't.
> Is there any intent that this delegation control applies to any "oauth
> context"?
Not from me.
-- Scott
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Peter Williams, 03/30/2009
- RE: [Shib-Dev] FW: [security-services] Public Review of SAML 2.0 Profiles, Scott Cantor, 03/30/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.