shibboleth-dev - Re: beta idp difficulty
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Chad La Joie <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: beta idp difficulty
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:44:04 -0400
- Organization: OIS - Middleware
I thought I had a <context>/shibboleth/SSO article listing all the
endpoints in the IdP but I guess not. They are:
/shibboleth/SSO
/saml1/SOAP/AttributeQuery
/saml/SOAP/ArtifactResolution
/saml2/POST/SSO
/saml2/Redirect/SSO
/saml2/SOAP/AttributeQuery
/saml2/SOAP/ArtifactResolution
General format is /<protocol>/<binding>/<profile/operation>
Jim Fox wrote:
>
> I have some config questions.
>
>
> Am using "shibboleth" as the app name in tomcat. And have this
>
> ProxyPass /shibboleth ajp://localhost:8009/shibboleth
>
> in apache's config.
>
> In order to get shib to handle a request I have to use a URL like this:
>
> https://<hostname>/shibboleth/profile/shibboleth/SSO?rest_of_request.
>
> Is that expected and correct?
>
>
> I configured an RP with
>
> <RelyingParty id="urn:washington.edu:fox"
> provider="lost.cac.washington.edu">
> <ProfileConfiguration xsi:type="saml:ShibbolethSSOProfile" />
> <ProfileConfiguration xsi:type="saml:SAML1AttributeQueryProfile" />
> <ProfileConfiguration xsi:type="saml:SAML1ArtifactResolutionProfile" />
> <ProfileConfiguration xsi:type="saml:SAML2SSOProfile" />
> <ProfileConfiguration xsi:type="saml:SAML2AttributeQueryProfile" />
> <ProfileConfiguration xsi:type="saml:SAML2ArtifactResolutionProfile" />
> </RelyingParty>
>
> and got the metadata from our 1.3 idp's metadata file with a
> FilesystemMetadataProvider entry pointing to the 1.3 file.
>
> The idp's log showed it to be configured, with entries like
>
> .. Attempting to find parser with element name:
> {urn:mace:shibboleth:2.0:relying-party}RelyingParty
> .. Relying party configuration - relying party id urn:washington.edu:fox
> .. Relying party configuration - provider ID: lost.cac.washington.edu
> .. Relying party configuration - default authentication method:
> urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:unspecified
> .. Relying party configuration - 6 profile configurations
> .. Attempting to find parser for element of type:
> {urn:mace:shibboleth:2.0:relying-party:saml}ShibbolethSSOProfile
> .. Attempting to find parser for element of type:
> {urn:mace:shibboleth:2.0:relying-party:saml}SAML1AttributeQueryProfile
> .. Attempting to find parser for element of type:
> {urn:mace:shibboleth:2.0:relying-party:saml}SAML1ArtifactResolutionProfile
> .. Attempting to find parser for element of type:
> {urn:mace:shibboleth:2.0:relying-party:saml}SAML2SSOProfile
> .. Attempting to find parser for element of type:
> {urn:mace:shibboleth:2.0:relying-party:saml}SAML2AttributeQueryProfile
> .. Attempting to find parser for element of type:
> {urn:mace:shibboleth:2.0:relying-party:saml}SAML2ArtifactResolutionProfile
>
>
>
> However as soon as I attempt a login I get a "no relying party" error:
>
> .. Looking up relying party configuration for lost.cac.washington.edu
> .. No relying party configuration was registered for
> lost.cac.washington.edu looking up configuration based on metadata groups
> .. No relying party configuration found for lost.cac.washington.edu
> using default configuration
> .. Shibboleth SSO profile is not configured for relying party
> lost.cac.washington.edu
>
>
> What RP config am I missing?
>
> Jim
>
>
> p.s. When tomcat starts I see an error in the idp-process log
>
> Parse Error at line 812 column 21:
> The content of element type "action-mappings" must match "(action)*".
>
> which seems to be unrelated to shib, but shows up only in the idp's log.
>
--
Chad La Joie 2052-C Harris Bldg
OIS-Middleware 202.687.0124
- beta idp difficulty, Jim Fox, 09/19/2007
- Re: beta idp difficulty, Scott Cantor, 09/19/2007
- Re: beta idp difficulty, Chad La Joie, 09/19/2007
- Re: beta idp difficulty, Jim Fox, 09/19/2007
- Re: beta idp difficulty, Chad La Joie, 09/19/2007
- Beta IDP Authentication, Jeff.Krug, 09/20/2007
- RE: Beta IDP Authentication, Jeff.Krug, 09/20/2007
- Re: Beta IDP Authentication, Will Norris, 09/21/2007
- RE: Beta IDP Authentication, Jim Fox, 09/21/2007
- Re: Beta IDP Authentication, Chad La Joie, 09/21/2007
- RE: Beta IDP Authentication, Jeff.Krug, 09/20/2007
- Re: beta idp difficulty, Jim Fox, 09/19/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.