shibboleth-dev - RE: RPM problems
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: RPM problems
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:05:31 -0500
> The timestamp thing is fine. We had some local tools compiled against
> xerces-c. I had two rpms with the same version and release number. The
> tool complained about one of the symbols being a different size in the
> shared object with the newer RPM with a build date of Oct 6, but executed
> fine with the older RPM against which I had originally compiled the tool
> (build date Jun 05). This means the two packages are not equivalent and
> should have had a different release number in my opinion.
I suspect this has to do with the fact that some of the packages have been
shared between RH and Fedora and sometimes the sharing stops working. I'm
not doing that any longer since it doesn't seem to work reliably. In return
I'll probably stop maintaining old Fedora builds.
Sorry, but it's a volunteer service and I'd be just as happy to let somebody
else do it. Until then, I guess people will have to live with the occasional
hiccup. They're not intentional.
-- Scott
- RPM problems, Digant C Kasundra, 11/09/2006
- RE: RPM problems, Scott Cantor, 11/09/2006
- RE: RPM problems, Digant C Kasundra, 11/10/2006
- RE: RPM problems, Scott Cantor, 11/10/2006
- RE: RPM problems, Digant C Kasundra, 11/10/2006
- RE: RPM problems, Scott Cantor, 11/10/2006
- RE: RPM problems, Digant C Kasundra, 11/10/2006
- RE: RPM problems, Scott Cantor, 11/09/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.