shibboleth-dev - Re: attribute push

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: attribute push

From: "Tom Scavo" <>
To:
Subject: Re: attribute push
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 08:37:52 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=faSrCoNuZnSTUhhB47jcBFanPHFQhbokTN0N1n6dOws7CvBlssbUBAX98LUvPxryqfU2HKRm8tNoLY/TzvEDaVXU7z8HSgTbHZPwgZtuNheUp/ewseIGfaCXBqGnMeBoqErFHmyjYteB4lBVtuv4DyTOMKHaQhVEGFPft3QG/p8=

On 9/11/06, Chad la Joie
<>
wrote:

We didn't discuss the layout of the message but we are moving towards a
primarily attribute push model. My guess, for SAML 2 at least, would be
one assertion, two statements.

What would the lifetime of the assertion be in that case?

Thanks,
Tom

attribute push, Tom Scavo, 09/11/2006
- Re: attribute push, Chad la Joie, 09/11/2006
  - Re: attribute push, Tom Scavo, 09/11/2006
    - Re: attribute push, Chad la Joie, 09/11/2006
    - RE: attribute push, Scott Cantor, 09/11/2006
  - Re: attribute push, Tom Scavo, 09/11/2006
    - Re: attribute push, Chad la Joie, 09/11/2006
    - RE: attribute push, Scott Cantor, 09/11/2006
- RE: attribute push, Scott Cantor, 09/11/2006
  - Re: attribute push, Tom Scavo, 09/11/2006
    - RE: attribute push, Scott Cantor, 09/11/2006
      - Re: attribute push, Tom Scavo, 09/11/2006
        
        RE: attribute push, Scott Cantor, 09/11/2006

List archive

Re: attribute push