shibboleth-dev - Re: attribute push
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Chad la Joie <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: attribute push
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 08:07:02 -0400
- Organization: UIS - middleware
We didn't discuss the layout of the message but we are moving towards a primarily attribute push model. My guess, for SAML 2 at least, would be one assertion, two statements. We have no plans to drop the ability to export the full assertion to the protected resource, but we also acknowledge that some web servers will have issues with that as they restrict the amount of data that may go into a header.
Tom Scavo wrote:
What will a typical authn response look like in Shib 2.0? Will the
payload still be two separate assertions or are you considering one
assertion with two statements?
Assuming the authentication response contains two separate assertions,
will the Shib 2.0 SP continue to expose the complete response?
I missed the discussion of the SP at the F2F so I apologize in advance
if the following topic was covered. Instead of exposing the response
at the SP, why not expose the attribute assertion only (with the
response wrapper stripped away)? In that case, you end up with the
same thing irrespective of push or pull.
Also, why not nest the authentication assertion in the <Advice>
element of the attribute assertion? This exposes the authentication
context in its entirety and leaves it up to the consuming application
to make use of it or not, as the case may be.
Tom
--
Chad La Joie 2052-C Harris Bldg
OIS-Middleware 202.687.0124
- attribute push, Tom Scavo, 09/11/2006
- Re: attribute push, Chad la Joie, 09/11/2006
- Re: attribute push, Tom Scavo, 09/11/2006
- Re: attribute push, Chad la Joie, 09/11/2006
- RE: attribute push, Scott Cantor, 09/11/2006
- Re: attribute push, Tom Scavo, 09/11/2006
- Re: attribute push, Chad la Joie, 09/11/2006
- RE: attribute push, Scott Cantor, 09/11/2006
- Re: attribute push, Tom Scavo, 09/11/2006
- RE: attribute push, Scott Cantor, 09/11/2006
- Re: attribute push, Tom Scavo, 09/11/2006
- RE: attribute push, Scott Cantor, 09/11/2006
- Re: attribute push, Tom Scavo, 09/11/2006
- RE: attribute push, Scott Cantor, 09/11/2006
- Re: attribute push, Tom Scavo, 09/11/2006
- Re: attribute push, Chad la Joie, 09/11/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.