Shibboleth Developers

[Chad La Joie <>]

Don't feel bad.  I've read the spec more times then I care to count  
anymore and I didn't recall that section.  I just maintain that Scott  
has the advantage that he wrote he the thing, so he knows it pretty  
well.  ;)

On Jun 19, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Tom Barton wrote:

> Thanks. For the Nth time, RTFM. :-)
>
> Scott Cantor wrote:
> > > Is something like this permissible, feasible, or planned? This  
> > > seems different from delegation - is it?
> > Yes, it's called SSO proxying and is a SAML 2.0 feature (see sec.  
> > 3.4.1.5 of
> > core).
> > I don't believe there's been any discussion of it yet. Eventually  
> > I'm sure
> > we can support it, but I don't think it's on the 2.0 list. That  
> > doesn't mean
> > one couldn't rig it up on top of the base implementation.
> > -- Scott