shibboleth-dev - Re: SAML Artifact attribute
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Ian Young <>
- To:
- Cc: , ,
- Subject: Re: SAML Artifact attribute
- Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 13:11:02 +0100
Scott Cantor wrote:
Artifact can be faster
We did some informal side-by-side testing of Artifact+push vs. POST+query a while back, and found that the Artifact+push case was noticeably faster for us. I suppose the amount of improvement probably depends on the speed of the machines involved, though.
Another attraction is that you don't see the "we're redirecting you" page flash by, which is a win from a user education point of view.
I'm not saying "Artifact+push is better"; there are too many other things in the balance for it to be possible to make that kind of statement. But it seems to be best from a user experience perspective.
-- Ian
- Re: SAML Artifact attribute, Ian Young, 05/01/2006
- RE: SAML Artifact attribute, Scott Cantor, 05/01/2006
- Re: SAML Artifact attribute, Tom Scavo, 05/01/2006
- RE: SAML Artifact attribute, Scott Cantor, 05/01/2006
- Re: SAML Artifact attribute, Ian Young, 05/02/2006
- Re: SAML Artifact attribute, Tom Scavo, 05/01/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: SAML Artifact attribute, Tom Scavo, 05/01/2006
- RE: SAML Artifact attribute, Scott Cantor, 05/01/2006
- Re: SAML Artifact attribute, Tom Scavo, 05/01/2006
- RE: SAML Artifact attribute, Scott Cantor, 05/01/2006
- Re: SAML Artifact attribute, Tom Scavo, 05/01/2006
- RE: SAML Artifact attribute, Scott Cantor, 05/01/2006
- RE: SAML Artifact attribute, Scott Cantor, 05/01/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.