shibboleth-dev - Re: getting the REMOTE_USER header

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: getting the REMOTE_USER header

From: "Tom Scavo" <>
To:
Subject: Re: getting the REMOTE_USER header
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 22:27:27 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eiBAt3m2Ti9qmZYkKy7Dv89Ai7EXB8oVx/+O7TamQJZ0cm/DZpdX/y6XWtcd8U4cg28Th68Okzycu94G3EHG86V4wDRi/XJEZWVBUbXZAzHiOxeSIlLO+K3WzKAQ4M45eOmNiZwZhIirPZW+iCPNdcFBQTJew5RFLfSawCCIlUs=

On 4/15/06, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
> I take it back, that fix post-dates the 1.1b tag, it just happens to be on
> the branch.
>
> Since 2.8 fixes the bug, I would suggest just updating Xerces anyway.

Okay, I can fix this in my sandbox, but what happens when I distribute
the code? What versions of Shibboleth/OpenSAML/Xerces are required to
run this code?

Tom

getting the REMOTE_USER header, Tom Scavo, 04/15/2006
- Re: getting the REMOTE_USER header, Chad La Joie, 04/15/2006
  - Re: getting the REMOTE_USER header, Tom Scavo, 04/15/2006
    - RE: getting the REMOTE_USER header, Scott Cantor, 04/15/2006
    - RE: getting the REMOTE_USER header, Scott Cantor, 04/15/2006
      - Re: getting the REMOTE_USER header, Tom Scavo, 04/15/2006
        
        RE: getting the REMOTE_USER header, Scott Cantor, 04/16/2006

List archive

Re: getting the REMOTE_USER header