shibboleth-dev - Re: authentication strength

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: authentication strength

From: Tom Scavo <>
To:
Subject: Re: authentication strength
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:14:16 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WkKdO9WqR+kp1Q1Et/7ZfCKw9+sY2WVw794r+qcsGARfeGuDl6tL48XMBwnCQX9f0VaE8SBp/nO2wyQjhyMIWCUsWW8KiylxcSUZ9+6dP9YK8ZC2k4jR5H5ypKlJhXKTp8lsoDuqUZLmlgvF9KF2NVzPE7A8dI+V1yS2K8k5Ey8=

On 2/16/06, Ian Young
<>
wrote:
>
> http://bugzilla.internet2.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=493

Marvelous! This is more useful than AuthenticationMethod.

Thanks, Ian and Scott.

Tom

authentication strength, Tom Scavo, 02/15/2006
- RE: authentication strength, Ramanathan, Subbu, 02/15/2006
- Re: authentication strength, Walter Hoehn, 02/15/2006
  - Re: authentication strength, Tom Scavo, 02/15/2006
    - RE: authentication strength, Scott Cantor, 02/15/2006
      - Re: authentication strength, Ian Young, 02/16/2006
        
        Re: authentication strength, Tom Scavo, 02/16/2006
      - Re: authentication strength, Tom Scavo, 02/16/2006
      - Re: authentication strength, Von Welch, 02/16/2006
        
        Re: authentication strength, Keith Hazelton, 02/16/2006
        
        Re: authentication strength, Tom Scavo, 02/19/2006
        
        Re: authentication strength, Keith Hazelton, 02/19/2006

List archive

Re: authentication strength